Mike is the new leader of an international virtual team and in his first meeting with team members, he discovered that he had a team member who appeared to resist every suggestion made by other members of the team: this person either flat-out rejected the ideas; pointed out the possible problems as being unsolvable; presented a list of reasons why they would not work and generally showed how smart he was (in his opinion). Mike hoped that this would not be an on-going situation. However, in a video conference a month later Mike discovered that the team member continued behaving in the same way. Afterwards, Mike spoke to some of the other team members and the team member’s ex-boss & discovered that this was “normal” behaviour for this person. Mike decided that things had to change so started researching ways to deal with this situation. This is what he discovered: He had a Polarity Responder in his team!
What is a “Polarity Responder” (P.R.) or “Mismatcher”?
1. A P.R. is someone who tends to disagrees with everything that you, or other people, say.
2. They often do exactly the opposite of what you want or ask them to do.
3. In meetings they always present reasons for NOT doing something instead of looking for reasons to do it!
4. Frequently, their first response will be to produce an exception to the rule.
5. Often they see their response as an opportunity to show how smart they are.
6. They tend to be analytical and very intelligent.
7. They can destroy a great idea with a single syllable.
In order for them to be “successful” in their opposition, they need to break rapport with the other person / people and the easiest way to do it is by using “BUT”:
E.G., “I totally agree with you. BUT… (followed by arguments against it)”
“I love your product, BUT… (followed by arguments against buying it)”
As I am sure you all know, subconsciously, the information “BUT” invalidates everything that has been said before it. It should only be used when you CONSCIOUSLY decide that you want to use this form to unprotected to a specific communicative objective.
For example: “I love the idea, BUT there are some problems… ” (In other words I don’t really love the idea!”)
As an different to the use of “BUT” in general, I would like to propose that you use alternatives such as those indicated below:
“I love the idea and there appear to be some problems… ” (Both elements are valid)
“I love the idea. However there seem to be some problems… ” (Both elements are valid)
“I love the idea. Nevertheless there are some problems… ” (Both elements are valid)
“I love the idea. however there are some problems… ” (Both elements are valid)
Specific techniques for dealing elegantly with Polarity Responders:
1. Use the “Polarity Twist” – put everything you say in the negative (+ BUT).
“I think that you will probably not agree with me, but… “
“You are probably are not going to like this, but… “
“This may not be the best idea that I’ve ever had, but… “
“I don’t know if this is something you’d like to be involved in, but”
“I have an idea that probably won’t work, but I wanted to see what you think.”
When phrases similar to those indicated above are used, a shared response to the “Polarity Twist” is a positive reaction to the negative: psychologically you are asking them to respond to your negative which, in their mind, requires an opposite response. The opposite response to a negative is, clearly, a positive!
Example: ” Well… no. I do truly agree with you.
An example close to home is that of putting young children to bed. Many resist when older siblings are allowed to go to bed later. A direct order often results in an argument. Use the polarity twist and avoid the problems!
Tell young children: “You can’t go to bed and you have to stay up all night!”
shared response: “But Mummy, I’m tired. I want to go to bed.”
The reason this technique works is that is based on how the human brain processes negative orders. When our brains hear a negative, in order to understand it, it has to course of action the positive first.
Do NOT think of a pink Elephant!
What are you thinking about?
Probably a pink elephant!
I told you NOT to think about a pink elephant so why did you disobey my instruction? You couldn’t help yourself, could you?
2. Recognition & Limitation.
In a meeting where a N.R. is present, openly recognize their special skills and then limit their contributions to specific topics and moments. Frame their responses within special responsibilities or jobs most fitted to their skills & abilities:
“John, you have a special skill in identifying the little things that might prevent the project from being successfully completed. I would like you tell us, in the last five minutes of the meeting, what these could be. Until then, I would like you to listen carefully and observe down each one for your part of the meeting.”
3. clarify the negative points before they do.
“I think we could do this, and I can see it has certain problems such as… “
– The fact that you have identified the negative points will often rule the N.R. to consider positive ways to resolve these problems.
4. Exageration of negative effects.
– Take the bad or negative points that they bring up and embellish them to an extreme level.
“O.K., if the problems have no solution, let’s just fire everyone, sell off all the stock, close the building, go home, explain to our family that we can’t pay the mortgage and that we will be soon living under a bridge… etc”
5. A hopeless situation:
– Tell the P.R. that the situation is hopeless and that not already they would be capable of finding effective solutions to solve the problem. Then stand back and watch them tell you how it could be done!
While Polarity responders can appear to be a nuisance in meetings, presentation, team activities, etc., they are typically very intelligent and, when redirected properly, their skills and ability can greatly enhance the results obtained. When you apply the techniques indicated above you are clearly demonstrating your communication and leadership skills to your companions which can positively influence your future career prospects!